Quick Answer: How Long Is Peer Review Process?

What happens after peer review?

The peer review is completed once all the reviewers send the journal a detailed report with their comments on the manuscript and their recommendation.

Typically, journals ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks..

What are the benefits of being a peer reviewer?

WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF BEING A REVIEWER?You can make interesting and valuable contacts with Editorial board members who are the recognized experts in your subject(s). … Also being a reviewer is self-satisfaction. … Establish your expertise in the field and expand your knowledge.You will be aware of the latest methods and trends in your area of expertise.More items…

How long does the Elsevier decision process take?

4-8 weeksHow long should I wait for this stage? Answer: Most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision.

How long does it take for a journal article to be reviewed?

The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete.

What should I write in a peer review?

DoJustify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples.Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve.Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript.Be professional and respectful. … Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript!Feb 6, 2020

How long does it take for reviews to be completed?

Answer: When the status shows “Required reviews completed,” it means that the reviews have come in. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the reviewers were probably already familiar with it, so they could review it within a short time.

What is the process of a peer review?

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether a manuscript should be published in their journal.

How many peer reviewers are needed?

2To the best of my knowledge, the editor assigns the reviewing process to 2 individual reviewers, after the initial manuscript selection. However, 2 is considerd to be the minimum number acceptable, whereas the maximum number of reviewers is not always defined.

How long it takes to publish a paper?

(He chose the journals largely because they make the data easily accessible, and because he was waiting for a paper to be published in PLoS ONE.) He found that the mean review time had roughly doubled in the past decade, from 50–130 days to 150–250 days, depending on the journal (see go.nature.com/s3voeq).

How effective is peer review?

Peer review is perceived as one of the mainstays of scientific publishing. … Papers that undergo the peer review process are generally considered to be of high quality since they are scrutinized by experts before publication.

How long does a peer review take?

These figures differ between accepted and rejected manuscripts, with first response time of rejected manuscripts taking, on average, 4 weeks longer. While writing a peer review may take between 4 and 8 h, in only 19% of all reported cases authors were informed about the outcome in less than a month.

How long is desk rejection?

1 to 4 weeksDesk rejects are usually quite quick (e.g., 1 to 4 weeks is common in my experience). Note that not all journals do desk rejects, and many journals vary in how much they filter at this stage. First round rejections: This is where the paper is rejected after the first round of external review.

Why does peer review take so long?

Late Reviews Once the required number of reviewers have agreed to read and comment on your manuscript, we then have to wait for them to submit their review. … However long the reviewer is given, there is very little the journal can do to ensure that they stick to the deadline, other than to send them reminders.

Who can be a peer reviewer?

2 Answers. Who can peer-review articles? Anyone competent enough to be asked in the first place. For conferences (e.g., in engineering or computer science), peer-review is conducted by a Programme Committee.

Does decision in process mean rejection?

‘Decision in Process’ on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). A ‘Decision in Process’ soon after submission typically indicates that the manuscript is being desk-rejected.

What does peer review do?

Peer review involves subjecting the author’s scholarly work and research to the scrutiny of other experts in the same field to check its validity and evaluate its suitability for publication. A peer review helps the publisher decide whether a work should be accepted.

What is the first step in the peer review process?

The peer review processStep 1: Editor assessment. download PDF. … Step 2: First round of peer review. The editor will then find and contact other researchers who are experts in your field, asking them to review the paper. … Step 3: Revise and resubmit. … Step 4: Accepted.

Do peer reviewers get paid?

A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc.